1.The importance of the scene “Your baby has finger nails” from Juno (2007)
The scene “Your baby has finger nails”
from ‘Juno’ (2007) is pivotal to the film’s storyline. Before Juno’s
confrontation with Su-Chin, she was conclusively determined to get an abortion.
She was sure that she was not capable of being a mother because she is a
teenager. Her mind slightly started to change after she listened to Su-Chin’s
strong appeal.
![]() |
| A scene from 'Juno' (2007) |
At first she did not understand the fact
babies have finger nails. Judging from her facial expression and the tone in
her voice, it seems that she never thought about that before (see the image on the right side). However, she began to consider it when she was filling out the form at
the hospital. She looked at everyone else’s finger nails there. Although they
are only finger nails, a seemingly insignificant human body part, they are
still evidence of human life. Looking around, young Juno becomes aware that her
baby is also alive.
Since she realized this, she has changed
her mind completely, and decided to have a baby. She abandons the idea of
abortion and starts to pursue adoption instead. This scene is a crucial turning
point for Juno as a teenage mother, and changes the direction of the film.
2.Mise en scene analysis from ‘The Great Gatsby’
The low camera angle employed in
this scene from ‘The Great Gatsby’ (2013) illustrates the complex character
relationships of the film (see the image below). This technique makes the audience feel scared at
Gatsby, who is on the right. This angle is effective that he seems to be
frightening. Viewers would sense an unusual atmosphere from him.
In addition to the camera angle, the color
of the ceiling plays an important role. If its color were bright, viewers would
feel differently. Since it is dark, it attaches the scaring atmosphere from
him.
Also, the audience would notice Gatsby is
not satisfied with this situation. The difference of the amount of lighting on
Gatsby and Nick, who is at the middle, is a significant point to look at. The
amount of the light which lights Gatsby is smaller.
![]() |
| A scene (44:54) from 'The Great Gatsby' (2013) |
From this difference, viewers can guess
that Nick does not have a bad feeling against Tom, who is on the left. This is
evidenced by the amount of the lighting towards Nick.
However, viewers can notice that Gatsby’s
face is in a dark. This implies that he does not like Tom. Interestingly, it
seems that Tom does not know Gatsby’s feeling because he turns his back on
Gatsby. Only audiences are privy to Gatsby’s feeling toward Tom. The audience
would be interested in the relationship between Gatsby and Tom from this
moment.
3.The plot structure of ‘500 days with Summer’
The complex plot structure used in ‘500
days with Summer’ (2009) is effective in maintaining viewer interest. The story
is not shown chronologically. Therefore, the audience is encouraged to
concentrate on what is going to happen between the two main characters, Tom and
Summer. Judging from fragments which are shown unchronologically, audiences need
to consider the end, rather than see and enjoy the end.
It begins with the last part- 488 days
have already passed since Tom met Summer. It is difficult to predict whether
the relationship will come to a happy ending or not. Viewers, however, might
guess their relationship will end as the title implies a limited time with
Summer.
Nevertheless, the film at first indicates
that the relationship might end happily. At the beginning, audiences see the
scene which Summer’s hand with a ring is on Tom’s hand (see the image below).
It would be natural that the audience expects this film to end happily.
Ultimately, it ends differently from the expectation that they will live
happily ever after. It is unveiled that they are going to break up. At the last
part, viewers again see the same shot as the beginning and finally discover how
it ends.
![]() |
| A scene from '500 days with Summer' (2009) |
Telling the story unchronologically,
audiences are urged not only to enjoy the film, but also to consider the story.
Although this structure is complicating, the film succeeds in holding audience
attention.



Commentary 1: good general overview of the scene. Needed more consideration of how Juno changes as a character and how this propels the storyline after this scene. Engagement with key narrative terms/concepts (causality, narrative developments etc) may have also strengthened this commentary.
返信削除Commentary 2: The dark shades/use of light/ceiling colour are good points, grounding the scene in relation to the broader story and the character relations would have strengthen this commentary.
Commentary 3: analysis is a little general and needed to be more focussed on a central idea. Engagement with key narrative terms/concepts (causality, narrative developments etc) may have also strengthened this commentary. This sentence was also unclear for me: ‘Judging from fragments which are shown unchronologically, audiences need to consider the end, rather than see and enjoy the end”.
You have displayed a general ability to undertake film analysis. You make some good points, but your analysis also needs greater clarity and you need to work on developing your ideas further to them greater depth. Congratulations, Part A is now passed and complete!